If you make more money in high-sec then you do in null-sec then you're doing null-sec wrong

I know how you feel, I run high sec incursions and do sisters of eve and trust partners missions. I don't still go to my alliances ratting systems from time to time for a change up, but there are always neutrals about and I get interrupted a lot, which is fine because this is EVE but it makes it's where I think "why bother, i'll just go to high sec for what I need".

Yea, love me some pirate lvl 5 missions. I do them alot when I'm not doing 20/10 DED plexes or Wormhole Incursions......

(for those who can't take a hint, Pirate lvl 5 missions don't exist).

CeeCeePees they has more shtuff than me pweez nerfvs it or make my stuffs better

Nullbear tears are the sweetest

Wait I think you're perverting the idea of risk/reward. You mean to say that you, the single player who is taking a huge risk, should not be interfered with by that organized alliance actively patrolling and defending their space, probing you out, etc - since after all there are 30 of them they are taking no risk. So all reward to you and not to them, right?

so basically you want CCP to remove players from 0.0 so you could run missions as safe as in empire for the better rewards?

^ and that's how you do it

No. Basically, he wants the rewards in 0.0 to be large enough to (more than) compensate for the interruptions from the players out there.

Jeez, another nerf hi-sec thread.

In EVE, risk vs reward is largely created by the players themselves. Which is pretty cool, if you ask me.

OP, if shooting at red crosses in nullsec yielded substantially more ISK (like +50% or more), I think this would happen:

1) more people would do it
2) more people would hunt the more people doing it

End result would be nullsec PVE would get harder (competition for sites/belts + more guys out to get you) so you may actually end up making roughly the same ISK/hour (net after losses) as today! Or who knows, maybe even less.

So you'd get more players in null, which is probably a good idea actually, but not necessarily more ISK per player.


Also, what's so bad about doing your pew in null and your missioning in highsec? You probably only need a jump clone and a single PVE-capable ship (that you'll hardly ever lose unless it's too shiny). In a big complex universe like EVE, wanting to do everything in the same place will inevitably be kind of inefficient - not to mention possibly boring.

apparently i am stupid

i always thought the crystal army was paid by running guristas lvl 5 missions.